﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Travis Miller &#187; Design &amp; User Experience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.electrumdigital.com/category/design-user-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.electrumdigital.com</link>
	<description>Web Developer for Hire</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:17:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The $300,000,000 Button</title>
		<link>http://www.electrumdigital.com/2009/10/the-300000000-button/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electrumdigital.com/2009/10/the-300000000-button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design & User Experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electrumdigital.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think that usability, information architecture, and user experience design are made-up disciplines for lily-gilding aesthetes, with little practical bearing on your Web site, think again.
Jared Spool explains how changing one button in a site's checkout process increased sales by $300 million per year. (He doesn't name the retailer in the article, but it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think that usability, information architecture, and user experience design are made-up disciplines for lily-gilding aesthetes, with little practical bearing on your Web site, think again.</p>
<p>Jared Spool <a href="http://www.uie.com/articles/three_hund_million_button/">explains how changing one button in a site's checkout process</a> increased sales by $300 million per year. (He doesn't name the retailer in the article, but it starts with "A" and ends with "mazon.com".)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electrumdigital.com/2009/10/the-300000000-button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ellipses and interrobangs and em-dashes, oh my!</title>
		<link>http://www.electrumdigital.com/2009/10/ellipses-and-interrobangs-and-em-dashes-oh-my/</link>
		<comments>http://www.electrumdigital.com/2009/10/ellipses-and-interrobangs-and-em-dashes-oh-my/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design & User Experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.electrumdigital.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typography is one of the most overlooked aspects of Web design—and I'm not talking about fonts, kerning, and x-heights. I'm talking about proper use of glyphs—the individual letters, numerals, and (especially) punctuation marks that make up all written text. There are proper and improper ways to use each glyph&#8212;and even large, well-funded websites often get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typography is one of the most overlooked aspects of Web design—and I'm not talking about fonts, kerning, and x-heights. I'm talking about proper use of glyphs—the individual letters, numerals, and (especially) punctuation marks that make up all written text. There are proper and improper ways to use each glyph&#8212;and even large, well-funded websites often get it wrong.</p>
<p>This isn't surprising—even if a site's designer is trained in the specialized discipline of typography (which is unlikely), the person who actually marks up the content (or pastes it into the content management system) probably isn't. But the fact remains that poor typography is one of the most common and most easily avoided blemishes on the web.</p>
<p><span id="more-150"></span>
<p>Am I being pedantic? You may think so—but I encourage you to hear me out and give it a try. I think your pages will read more easily, and look more professional and consistent. Even if readers aren't consciously aware of the typographical subtleties, they <em>do</em> increase a text's ability to communicate—that's why the conventions were devised in the first place.</p>
<p>Rather than reinventing the wheel, I'll simply point you to <a href="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/emen/">A List Apart's excellent article</a> on the subject, with a few addenda of my own:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>As the <acronym title="A List Apart">ALA</acronym> article explains, a hyphen is not an em-dash or an en-dash. The hyphen is <em>also</em> not a minus sign&#8212;there's a separate glyph for that. It's <code class="html">&#38;#8722;</code>.</p>
<p>Similarly, the lowercase letter x is not a multiplication symbol&#8212;that's <code class="html">&#38;#215;</code>.</p>
<p>These glyphs are designed to align well with numerals and with each other. Here's the vernacular version:</p>
<p>
<blockquote>9 + 3 - 4 x 2</p></blockquote>
<p>And here's the correct version:</p>
<p>
<blockquote>9 + 3 &#8722; 4 &#215; 2</p></blockquote>
<p>Which one looks best to you?</p>
<p>(If you're looking for the division symbol, that's <code class="html">&#38;#247;</code>.)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>When marking up vulgar fractions (<span lang="la">i.e.</span>, those in which the numerator and denominator are separated by a diagonal line, as in "1&#8260;2"), use the fraction slash (<code class="html">&#38;#8260;</code>) rather than the regular slash.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>If you're using Windows, you can type exotic characters by holding down Alt and typing the character's <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows-1252#Codepage_layout">four-digit code</a> on the keypad. For example, Alt+0151 produces an em-dash.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>If you're marking up foreign words (or English words, for that matter) which contain diacritics (commonly known as "accent marks"), then <em><a href="http://www.elizabethcastro.com/html/extras/entities.html#html">include the diacritics</a></em>! They aren't just there for decoration&#8212;they're part of the word's spelling, and if you get them wrong, you've misspelled the word as surely as if you'd substituted one letter for another. It's "jalape&#241;o", not "jalapeno"; "saut&#233;", not "saute"; "f&#234;te", not "fete".</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Granted, useful content and a solid technical foundation are more critical to a site's success than proper use of em-dashes—but every whole is the sum of a thousand details, and good typographical habits will become second nature after a short while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.electrumdigital.com/2009/10/ellipses-and-interrobangs-and-em-dashes-oh-my/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
